'Gavin Menzies’ Voyages\r'

'Gavin Menzies Essay Gavin Menzies was a purplish navy submarine captain that worked for the British governing and now is trying to let the world cheat his opinion on the tracey of the Americas: did the Chinese discover the Americas before Columbus? Menzies takes on a navigate where he tries to find evidence to support his thesis and comes up with several diametric theories; his first point in time: Calicut. Menzies claims that the Ming dynastys famous navigator Zheng He managed to reach the mantel of good hope and from there he should sustain reached the Americas too.Gavin as well claims that a famous Italian writer of the time, Nicolo ‘ Di Conti, might drop made contact with Zheng ‘s fleet in Calicut and might have also left with them for the New World; Unfortunately for Menzies this sentiment was quickly discarded for there are historical records that suggest that Di Conti immediately returned back to Italy after his journey to Calicut ( he might have al so carried rough Chinese maps of their tours with him).Menzies then pulls out some more(prenominal) evidence that a map found was possibly a Chinese map that led to the islands of the Antilles, unless according to a few historians and cartographers, the maps were confusing unfaithful and the islands were displaced in random places. The possibility of a ship canal on one of the tropical islands was rejected by many geologists that state that those rocks where there for no suspect reason.Still non giving up on his quest, Gavin Menzies moderately alters his theory: he affirms that an Italian, Verazzano, went on a voyage with the Chinese and stating that he saw â€Å" people zip like Chinese”; but as we already know, even Columbus, eyeshot that the people he thought were Chinese but they were just the Native American tribes that lived on the coastline.It was also verified that Indigenous people were descendants of other Asian tribes that might have reached the Americas by crossing an icy passage in North America. There is no concrete information or evidence that the Chinese ever got to America, because if that were so than the Chinese would have set up outposts, settled or maybe started trading the tropical goods with europium and probably could have made a possibility!Lastly, Menzies tries convincing the people when he claims that an old Chinese report states that the Ming fleet arrived at the shore of almost 3000 different countries(the only way to do this was by reaching the Americas too)! The Chinese historian that owned the collect rejects this last of Gavins theories because of a simple calligraphy misinterpretation: the Chinese character ” ” inwardness 30 and ” ” means 3000 so the record can be interpret because the record actually just meant 30 different countries…Any claims concerning narration, especially when it has been firmly accepted by historians and other professionals on that certain topic, should have trusty and plausible evidence along with clarifications and explanations to be support; That is how history has been built up so uttermost and its how it will continue to be built. When an argument concerning history that relies on inaccurate evidence and unsupported theories, much(prenominal) as that found in Menzies show. The argument does not deserve to be reconsidered.\r\n'